In 30 weeks, I will posses a BFA in the discipline of drawing and painting. In and of itself,the degree means little as credentials to be an artist. Lots of people have them that neither draw, or paint, and never will once they leave the university system.
So why is the degree so coveted by me? I have resented the process as much as I have pined for it. In this quantitative society, creative out put has very little value to consumers without there being a tie-in of function. A formal degree, does not imply talent or training, it infers discipline. And that is the great American equalizer in the 21st Century. No one will EVER ask you if you finished high school, but they will want proof of your undergrad experience.
Now that I am relatively secure that I will get that those three letters after my name, what will they get me? In a word-access. In the very insular world of fine art, you need one of two things; street 'cred, or an MFA to "play." As I am neither a child virtuoso, or painting with my teeth, it is back to Academia, for me to prove my discipline for the sport of art.
And it is a very competitive sport, this Art Thing. CALL TO ENTRY. We scour the trades for it like "O" searching for the Roissey Academy. We hope some recognition, even if it is rejection, will be a pleasurable pain, and worth all the discipline.

